🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.